Empirical verification of Esping-Andersen’s typology of welfare state financial models on a global sample of countries


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Problem. The relevance of the study is caused by the need for empirical verification of G. Esping-Andersen’s classical typology of welfare state systems in the context of the global transformation of public financial regulation models. Aim. The aim of this work is to test the stability of the three ideal types (social-democratic, conservative-corporatist, liberal) based on outcome indicators of poverty and income inequality, as well as the standard of living, using a global sample of countries. Methods. The methodological framework consisted of principal component analysis (PCA) and k-means clustering (optimal number of clusters k=9, silhouette coefficient 0.405) based on World Bank data for 2019– 2024 (142 countries), followed by verification using instrumental characteristics of tax and transfer mechanisms. Results. It was established that the classical Esping-Andersen models do not form separate clusters based on outcome indicators but are united into a single cluster, demonstrating outcome convergence (poverty rate 0.6–1.3 %, income Gini coefficient 0.280–0.317). At the same time, instrumental divergence persists, manifested in differences in tax progressivity, the structure of social insurance contributions, and the volume of social transfers. Russia is classified within the subgroup of post-socialist hybrid models with a limited redistributive function and the potential for increasing the progressivity of personal income taxation. A structural division was identified between countries with institutionalised social protection systems and states where informal solidarity mechanisms dominate (clusters 6–9). Conclusions. The conclusion is drawn about the necessity of a two-level typology of welfare state financial models: (1) institutional for upper-middle and highincome countries and (2) oriented towards informal social protection models for low-income economies with underdeveloped welfare systems.

About the authors

Mikhail L. Dorofeev

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: dorofeevml@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2829-9900

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor,
assistant professor of Chair of Public Finance of the Faculty of Finance.

Russian Federation, 125167, Russia, Moscow, Leningradsky Prospekt, 49/2.

References

  1. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 1990. 320 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/threeworldsofwel0000espi.
  2. Buhr D., Stoy V. More than just Welfare Transfers? A Review of the Scope of Esping-Andersen’s Welfare Regime Typology. Social Policy and Society, 2015, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 271–285. doi: 10.1017/S1474746414000542.
  3. Morel N., Palier B., Palme J. Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol, Policy Press Publ., 2012. 320 p. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt9qgqfg.
  4. Dorofeev M.L. Conceptual approaches to building financial models of social welfare in the context of structural economic transformation and global challenges. Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2025, no. 69, pp. 294–310. doi: 10.17223/19988648/69/17.
  5. Aspalter C. Ten Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: A Global Data Analysis. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore Publ., 2023. 236 p. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7863-0.
  6. Mäntyneva P. Do welfare regimes matter? Perceptions of welfare in contemporary world. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2024, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 236–248. doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-09-2023-0236.
  7. Powell M. Framing Beveridge. Social Policy & Administration, 2022, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 217–229. doi: 10.1111/spol.12764.
  8. Dorofeev M.L. Parametric features of financial and investment models of social security: methodological aspect. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management, 2025, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 182–196. doi: 10.21869/2223-1552-2025-15-1-182-196.
  9. Lushnikov A.M. The genesis of the German social insurance model: history and present. Siberian Law Review, 2020, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 328–345. doi: 10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-3-328-345.
  10. Studentsov V.B. Scandinavian model: lights and shades. Svobodnaya mysl, 2019, no. 4, pp. 147–167. EDN: ZJLRMB.
  11. Pierson P. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1994. 320 p.
  12. Korpi W., Palme J. The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review, 1998, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 661–687. doi: 10.2307/2657333.
  13. Antropov V.V. Socio-economic inequality in the modern world: assessment tools, trends and strategies to overcome. Economics, taxes & law, 2022, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 21–37. doi: 10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-3-21-37.
  14. Tanasova A.S., Sokolova E.Yu., Shandra I.G., Chigireva A.V. Tax and foreign exchange factors of inequality (to posing a problem). Voprosy ekonomiki, 2023, no. 1, pp. 146–159. doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-146-159.
  15. Demidova S.E. Assessment of the cyclical nature of fiscal policy in the EAEU countries. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 2025, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 153–166. doi: 10.18184/2079-4665.2025.16.1.153-166.
  16. Demidova S.E., Tyurina Yu.G. Assessing efficiency and scale of managing tax expendit ures to support investments and priority sectors in g20 countries’ economies during external shocks. Ars Administrandi (The Art of Management), 2025, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 44–73. doi: 10.17072/2218-9173-2025-1-44-73.
  17. Kim H., Lee J. Inequality and Poverty Reduction in South Korea: Lessons for Developing Economies. Asian Economic Review, 2018, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 221–245.
  18. Bobkov V.N., Dolgushkin N.K., Odintsova E.V. Universal basic income: reflections on the possible impact on improving the living standards and quality of life and the sustainability of society. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 2019, no. 3, pp. 8–24. doi: 10.24411/1999-9836-2019-10069.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Dorofeev M.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.