Enhancing the resilience of regional industry: governance mechanisms based on digital ecosystems
- Authors: Zlotnikov I.R.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Higher School of Economics
- Vernadsky Russian State University of National Economy
- Issue: No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 17-27
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukieconomika.ru/jour/article/view/916
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2074-2026-2-65-2
- ID: 916
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Abstract: In the context of geopolitical tensions and intensifying sanctions pressure, achieving technological sovereignty has become a key priority for ensuring the economic security of the Russian Federation. A mechanism for enhancing the resilience of the regional industrial sector has been developed, which is based on a three-component model: the government-science-business interaction (triple helix), the formation of specialised digital ecosystems taking into account the region’s competitive advantages (smart specialisation), and the coordination of innovation processes through regional innovation systems. Within this mechanism, a matrix of key performance indicators has been developed for calculating the innovation resilience index. The matrix includes two fundamentally new components: an index for the implementation of national projects in the field of digital transformation of industry and an integral indicator of the region’s digital ecosystem development (covering technopark infrastructure, the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies, and the level of digitalisation of production processes). Mechanism approbation on five constituent entities of the Russian Federation revealed that the leading region (index 10.00) outperforms the lagging region (index 4.16) by a factor of 2.4, while the gap in the “digital ecosystem development” component reaches 34.2 percentage points. DEA analysis identified that in four out of five (80 %) of the studied regions, the efficiency ratio for using innovation potential falls below 0.8, indicating significant untapped reserves. The results obtained confirm the viability of the proposed approach and suggest that targeted development of digital ecosystems could serve as a tool for reducing interregional disparities and strengthening the country’s technological independence.
About the authors
Ivan R. Zlotnikov
Higher School of Economics; Vernadsky Russian State University of National Economy
Author for correspondence.
Email: komendante1993@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-5380-7006
analyst of the Directorate for Expertise and Analytical Work,
specialist in the Administrative Support Department of the Administrative Department of the Scientific Center for the Study of Rural Problems.
References
- Afanasev A.A. Technological sovereignty: a question of essence. Creative Economy, 2022, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3691–3708. doi: 10.18334/ce.16.10.116406.
- Chernousov D.A. Technological sovereignty as a strategic priority of Russia's development: analysis and prospects. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2025, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 39–56. doi: 10.18334/vinec.15.1.122564.
- Miller A.E., Drozdov D.O. Study of trends in the process of import substitution in order to ensure the sustainability of the development of industrial enterprises. Herald of Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies, 2023, no. 2, pp. 138–143. EDN: HIPBMY.
- Andreev A.V., Emelyanov N.V. Digital transformation of industrial enterprises based on the concept of “Industry 4.0” as a factor of ensuring economic security of the country. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost i kachestvo, 2020, no. 2, pp. 6–11. EDN: OYWENF.
- Rong Huang, Shuai Mao. Enhancing the energy level of regional digital innovation ecosystems: A configuration perspective. PLOS ONE, 2024, vol. 19, no. 9, article number e0309229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309229.
- Afanasev A.A. Industry 4.0: prospects for digitalizing and transforming Russian industry. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1427–1446. doi: 10.18334/vinec.13.3.117880.
- Buevich A.P., Ivanova A.O., Fomin M.G. Characteristics of the digital transformation of Russian companies. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 2025, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 3081–3094. doi: 10.18334/epp.15.5.123006.
- Kulapov M.N., Pereverzeva E.I., Kirillova O.Yu. Business ecosystems: definitions, typologies, development practices. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1597–1612. doi: 10.18334/vinec.12.3.115234.
- Abramov V.I., Stolyarov A.D. Digital business ecosystems as a promising form of regional economic development. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 2024, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 5523–5542. doi: 10.18334/epp.14.10.121823.
- Han-Teng Liao, Chung-Lien Pan, Zhiying Wu. Digital transformation and innovation and business ecosystems: A bibliometric analysis for conceptual insights and collaborative practices for ecosystem innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2024, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 406–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.003.
- Bessonova E.A., Babichev A.O. Key aspects of managing the digital innovation ecosystem of the region's economy. Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions, 2024, no. 6, pp. 33–47. doi: 10.17308/meps/2078-9017/2024/6/33-47.
- Hellinga Z., Bachtrogler-Unger J., Balland P.-A., Boschma R. Beyond the Blueprint. From Smart Specialization Strategies to R&I Funding: papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 25-02. Dutch, Utrecht University Publ., 2025. 40 p.
- Gerelishina A.K. On the methodology of forming an innovative rating of Russian regions. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2022, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 62–71. doi: 10.21686/2413-2829-2022-1-62-71.
- Sennikova I.L. Regional innovative environment: methodology for assessing an institutional structure. Economics. Profession. Business, 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–60. doi: 10.14258/201907.
- Trippl M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer S., Kastrup J. Challenge-oriented regional innovation systems: towards a research agenda. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, 2024, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 105–116. doi: 10.38191/iirr-jorr.24.026.
- Yuzhuo Cai. Neo-Triple Helix model of innovation ecosystems: Integrating Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models. Triple Helix Journal, 2022, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76–106. doi: 10.1163/21971927-bja10029.
- Sherstneva O.M., Yasheva G.A. "Smart specialization" strategy of regions: theoretical aspects and European experience. Bulletin of Vitebsk State Technological University, 2022, no. 1, pp. 214–228. doi: 10.24412/2079-7958-2022-1-214-228.
- Barile D., Secundo G., Magnusson M. Exploring the digital innovation ecosystem from the perspective of platform-based startups: a case study in the film industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2025, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 4976–4999. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2024-1040.
- Ratner S.V. Evaluation of efficiency of eco-innovation management based on DEA models with lags and negative outputs. Control Science, 2020, no. 5, pp. 39–49. doi: 10.25728/pu.2020.5.5.
- Etzkowitz H., Chunyan Zhou. The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2nd ed. England, Routledge Publ., 2017. 176 p. doi: 10.4324/9781315620183.
- Rodionov A.N., Dyakonova M.A. Public-private partnership (PPP): theory of the issue and world experience in implementing PPP projects. Entrepreneur’s Guide, 2023, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 226–232. doi: 10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-4-226-232.
- Oborin M.S. The cluster development of region's industry. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika, 2022, no. 4, pp. 97–114. EDN: UWCBXP.
Supplementary files


