The impact of the divergence between IFRS and RAS debt burdens on the value of Moscow Exchange companies

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract: Problem. Russian public companies are required to prepare financial statements under both International Fi-nancing Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Russian Accounting Standards (RAS) simultaneously. Differences in the account-ing rules for leases, consolidation, and provisions cause the debt burden of the same company to differ substantially across the two reporting frameworks, creating measurable information opacity. At the same time, the dependence of the impact of this divergence on the market valuation of a company upon its level of leverage remains unstudied. Aim. To establish whether the divergence between debt under IFRS and RAS affects the EV/EBITDA market multiplier of public companies listed on the Moscow Exchange beyond the effect of absolute debt burden, and whether the strength of this effect depends on the company’s own level of leverage. Methods. Using an unbalanced panel of 189 firm-observations across 17 Mos-cow Exchange sectors for 2015–2024, three nested OLS regressions with sector and year fixed effects were estimated; standard errors were clustered by company. An author-developed indicator of the standards divergence, MASK = (IFRS Debt − RAS Debt) / IFRS Assets, was proposed. Robustness was verified on a quarterly sample (169 observations). Results. For companies with low debt burden, the divergence in standards significantly reduces the multiplier (coefficient −49.20; p = 0.055). As debt grows, the penalty weakens: the coefficient of interaction between MASK and leverage is posi-tive (+33.77; p = 0.005). The net discount reaches zero at Debt/EBITDA ≈ 1.46. On quarterly data, the results are repro-duced with increased significance. Conclusions. The market discounts valuations for the reporting divergence primarily among issuers with a simple debt structure, which is consistent with information asymmetry theory. Voluntary disclosure of a reconciliation of the standards, or the convergence of RAS with IFRS, serves as a tool for managing capitalisation.

About the authors

Radif R. Agadulin

Kazan Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: radif_agadulin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-9357-5854

postgraduate student of the Institute of Management, Economics and Finance

Russian Federation, 420008, Russia, Kazan, Kremlyovskaya Street, 18, bldg. 1

Aidar A. Ayupov

Kazan Federal University

Email: Ajdar.Ajupov@kpfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3646-4096

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department of Financial Markets and Financial Institutions of the Institute of Management, Economics and Finance

Russian Federation, 420008, Russia, Kazan, Kremlyovskaya Street, 18, bldg. 1

References

  1. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  2. Healy P.M., Palepu K.G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, vol. 31, no. 1-3, pp. 405–440. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0.
  3. Spence M. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 355–374. doi: 10.2307/1882010.
  4. Akerlof G.A. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 488–500. doi: 10.2307/1879431.
  5. Easley D., O'Hara M. Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 2004, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1553–1583. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00672.x.
  6. Lambert R., Leuz C., Verrecchia R.E. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 2007, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 385–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00238.x.
  7. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 1998, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1113–1155. doi: 10.1086/250042.
  8. Daske H., Hail L., Leuz C., Verdi R. Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 2008, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1085–1142. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00306.x.
  9. Horton J., Serafeim G., Serafeim I. Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment? Contemporary Accounting Research, 2013, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 388–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01159.x.
  10. Christensen H.B., Hail L., Leuz C. Capital-market effects of securities regulation: prior conditions, implementation, and enforcement. Review of Financial Studies, 2016, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2885–2924. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhw055.
  11. O Cualain G., Tawiah V. Review of IFRS consequences in Europe: An enforcement perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 2023, vol. 10, no. 1, art. 2148869. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2148869.
  12. Qiping Huang, Yongjia Li, Meimei Lin, McBrayer G.A. Natural disasters, risk salience, and corporate ESG disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2022, vol. 72, article number 102152. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102152.
  13. Viana D.B.C., Lourenço I.M.E.C., Paulo E. The effect of IFRS adoption on accrual-based and real earnings management: emerging markets' perspective. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 485–508. doi: 10.1108/JAEE-05-2021-0172.
  14. Dang N.H. The impact of earnings management and tax avoidance on the cost of debt in Vietnamese listed firms. Finance: Theory and Practice, 2026, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 64–80. doi: 10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-64-80.
  15. Radygin A., Abramov A., Chernova M. How the dividend policy of Russian companies from 2005 to 2024 affected capitalization and investor return. Economic Policy, 2025, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 6–37. doi: 10.18288/1994-5124-2025-3-6-37.
  16. Danilov Yu. Building long-term trust in sustainable finance. Economic Policy, 2023, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 122–147. doi: 10.18288/1994-5124-2023-5-122-147.
  17. Teplova T.V., Sokolova T.V., Tomtosov A.F., Buchko D.V., Nikulin D.D. The sentiment of private investors in explaining the differences in the trade characteristics of the Russian market stocks. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2022, no. 1, pp. 53–84. doi: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-3.
  18. Balash V.A., Fayzliev A.R. Volatility spillovers in the Russian stock market: responses to exogenous shocks. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2025, no. 2, pp. 65–84. doi: 10.31737/22212264_2025_2_65-84.
  19. Kirpishchikov D.A. Board of directors’ social capital as factor of companies’ resilience to exogenous shocks. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2024, no. 1, pp. 50–74. doi: 10.31737/22212264_2024_1_50-74.
  20. Modigliani F., Miller M.H. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 1958, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 261–297.
  21. Demidova E.G., Bogatov E.M. Models of structure capital management based on the lag determinants, including the cost of debt and tax. Finance: Theory and Practice, 2026, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 195–213. doi: 10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-195-213.
  22. Pomulev A.A. The development of a method for forecasting the business valuation of public companies within the framework of the comparative approach using artificial intelligence. Finance: Theory and Practice, 2026, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 81–97. doi: 10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-3-1862-02.
  23. Malkina M.Yu. Financial contagion from oil shocks during the pandemic: a cross-sector analysis. Terra Economicus, 2023, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 6–22. doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-2-6-22.
  24. Fudenberg D., Tirole J. A signal-jamming theory of predation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1986, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 366–376.
  25. Milova P.A. Family firms and financial performance. Evidence from Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2025, no. 3, pp. 112–144. doi: 10.31737/22212264_2025_3_112-144.
  26. Danilov Yu.A. Financial sector efficiency: present concepts and the estimation problem. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2022, no. 5, pp. 72–92. doi: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-57-5-5.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Agadulin R.R., Ayupov A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.