<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Digital Economy &amp; Innovations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Digital Economy &amp; Innovations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Цифровая экономика и инновации</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">3034-2074</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-4204</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Togliatti State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">119</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18323/2221-5689-2018-3-32-38</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">DO OBJECTS AND INSTITUTES OF PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS MATTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH OF REGIONS OF RUSSIA?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ИМЕЮТ ЛИ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ОБЪЕКТЫ И ИНСТИТУТЫ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНОЙ СОБСТВЕННОСТИ ДЛЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО РОСТА РЕГИОНОВ РОССИИ?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Кramin</surname><given-names>Timur Vladimirovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Крамин</surname><given-names>Тимур Владимирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Vice-rector for Corporate Management, Head of Chair of Financial Management</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор экономических наук, профессор, проректор по корпоративному управлению, заведующий кафедрой финансового менеджмента </p></bio><email>kramint@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Strelnikova</surname><given-names>Anastasia Sergeevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стрельникова</surname><given-names>Анастасия Сергеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>postgraduate student of Chair of Financial Management</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>аспирант кафедры финансового менеджмента</p></bio><email>strelnikova.1986@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">V.G. Timiryasov Kazan Innovative University (IEML), Kazan</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Казанский инновационный университет имени В.Г. Тимирясова (ИЭУП), Казань</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2018-09-28" publication-format="electronic"><day>28</day><month>09</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>32</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-04-14"><day>14</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-04-14"><day>14</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vektornaukieconomika.ru/jour/article/view/119">https://vektornaukieconomika.ru/jour/article/view/119</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper analyzes the contribution of intangible assets of Russian regions to their economic growth. The gross regional product (GRP) per capita is used as the main indicator of regional economic growth. The testing of models has been carried out based on regional panel data of the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2015 with the use of econometric modeling. The hypothesis is confirmed that there is a constant elasticity of the gross regional product per capita relative to indicators characterizing the degree of use of the main types of intellectual property objects. The high explanatory power of the linear relationship between the abovementioned variables is also econometrically confirmed. It is proved that among all the types of intellectual property used, according to which the Federal Institute of Industrial Property provides quantitative data, a significant influence on the gross regional product is provided by inventions, utility models and databases.</p><p>An important result of the study is a high contribution of the variable “Number of used databases” to the explanation of differences in regions, according to their per capita GRP level. It explains about 40 % of fluctuations in the dependent variable. This indicator characterizes the activity of the region in the use of systematized information on the basis of modern software products. It is an important indicator of the digital economy development with digital platforms as one of the key tools using databases to a certain extent.</p><p>The construction of regression models over different time intervals proves the strengthening of the influence of innovations on the welfare of the Russian regions. In particular, the variables “Number of inventions used” and “Number of utility models used” have a greater explanatory power in the period of 2010–2015 than in 2005–2010.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В данной работе проанализирован вклад нематериальных активов регионов России в их экономический рост. В качестве основного индикатора регионального экономического роста использован валовый региональный продукт (ВРП) на душу населения. Апробация моделей проведена по региональным панельным данным России с 2005 по 2015 гг. на основе эконометрического моделирования. Подтверждена гипотеза о наличии постоянной эластичности валового регионального продукта на душу населения относительно показателей, характеризующих степень использования основных видов объектов интеллектуальной собственности. Высокая объясняющая способность линейной зависимости между вышеуказанными переменными также эконометрически подтверждена. Доказано, что среди всех используемых видов интеллектуальной собственности, по которым Федеральный институт промышленной собственности предоставляет количественные данные, значительное влияние на валовый региональный продукт оказывают изобретения, полезные модели и базы данных.</p><p>Важным и вполне ожидаемым результатом исследования является высокий вклад в объяснение различий регионов по уровню подушевого ВРП переменной «Количество использованных баз данных». Она объясняет 40 % колебаний зависимой переменной. Указанный показатель характеризует активность региона по использованию систематизированной информации на основе современных программных продуктов. Он является важным индикатором развития цифровой экономики, одним из ключевых инструментов которой являются цифровые платформы, так или иначе использующие базы данных.</p><p>Построение регрессионных моделей по различным временным промежуткам позволяет сделать вывод об усилении, с течением времени, влияния инноваций на благосостояние регионов России. В частности, переменные «Количество использованных изобретений» и «Количество использованных полезных моделей» обладают большей объясняющей силой в период 2010–2015 гг., чем в 2005–2010 годы.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>patent activity</kwd><kwd>innovative activity</kwd><kwd>economic growth</kwd><kwd>regional economy</kwd><kwd>intellectual property</kwd><kwd>objects of intellectual property</kwd><kwd>patents</kwd><kwd>utility models</kwd><kwd>industrial designs</kwd><kwd>database</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>патентная активность</kwd><kwd>инновационная активность</kwd><kwd>экономический рост</kwd><kwd>региональная экономика</kwd><kwd>интеллектуальная собственность</kwd><kwd>объекты интеллектуальной собственности</kwd><kwd>патенты</kwd><kwd>полезные модели</kwd><kwd>промышленные образцы</kwd><kwd>базы данных</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований, в рамках исследовательского проекта № 18-410-160010 р_а.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romer P.M. Endogenous Technical Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, no. 5-2, pp. 71–102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Romer P.M. Endogenous Technical Change // Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98. № 5-2. P. 71–102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grossman G.M., Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Massachusetts, MIT Press Publ., 1991. 359 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grossman G.M., Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1991. 359 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grossman G.M., Helpman E. Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grossman G.M., Helpman E. Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1994. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 23–44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aghion P., Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 1992, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 323–351.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aghion P., Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction // Econometrica. 1992. Vol. 60. № 2. P. 323–351.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mankiw G.N., Romer D., Weil D.N. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 407–437.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mankiw G.N., Romer D., Weil D.N. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992. Vol. 107. № 2. P. 407–437.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hasan I., Tucci C.L. The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence. Research Policy, 2010, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1264–1276.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hasan I., Tucci C.L. The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence // Research Policy. 2010. Vol. 39. № 10. P. 1264–1276.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romer P.M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1002–1037.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Romer P.M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth // Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94. № 5. P. 1002–1037.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stokey N.L. R&amp;D and Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 1995, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 469–489.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stokey N.L. R&amp;D and Economic Growth // Review of Economic Studies. 1995. Vol. 62. № 3. P. 469–489.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Griliches Z. The Search for R&amp;D Spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1992, vol. 94, pp. 29–47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Griliches Z. The Search for R&amp;D Spillovers // Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 1992. Vol. 94. P. 29–47.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fagerberg J. Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1147–1175.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fagerberg J. Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates // Journal of Economic Literature. 1994. Vol. 32. № 3. P. 1147–1175.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirchhoff B.A. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism: The Economics of Business Firm Formation and Growth. USA, Greenwood Publ. Group, 1994. 218 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kirchhoff B.A. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism: The Economics of Business Firm Formation and Growth. USA: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1994. 218 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wennekers S., Thurik R. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 1999, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27–56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wennekers S., Thurik R. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth // Small Business Economics. 1999. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 27–56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Audretsch D.B. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Massachusetts, MIT Press Publ., 1995. 213 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Audretsch D.B. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995. 213 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirchhoff B.A., Newbert S.L., Hasan I., Armington C. The influence of university R&amp;D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2007, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 543–559.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kirchhoff B.A., Newbert S.L., Hasan I., Armington C. The influence of university R&amp;D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth // Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. 2007. Vol. 31. № 4. P. 543–559.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Cameron G. Innovation and growth: a survey of the empirical evidence. URL: nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/cameron/papers/empiric.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mansfield E. Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing. American Economic Review, 1980, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 863–873.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mansfield E. Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing // American Economic Review. 1980. Vol. 70. № 5. P. 863–873.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Griliches Z., Mairesse J. R&amp;D and productivity growth: comparing Japanese and US manufacturing firms. European Economic Review, 1986, vol. 21, pp. 89–119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Griliches Z., Mairesse J. R&amp;D and productivity growth: comparing Japanese and US manufacturing firms // European Economic Review. 1986. Vol. 21. P. 89–119.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1990, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1661–1707.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey // Journal of Economic Literature. 1990. Vol. 28. № 4. P. 1661–1707.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gould D.M., Gruben W.C. The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of development economics, 1996, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 323–350.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gould D.M., Gruben W.C. The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth // Journal of development economics. 1996. Vol. 48. № 2. P. 323–350.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Park W.G., Ginarte J.C. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1997, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 51–61.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Park W.G., Ginarte J.C. Intellectual property rights and economic growth // Contemporary Economic Policy. 1997. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 51–61.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Falvey R., Foster N., Greenaway D. Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics, 2006, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 700–719.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Falvey R., Foster N., Greenaway D. Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth // Review of Development Economics. 2006. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 700–719.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eicher T., García-Peñalosa C. Endogenous strength of intellectual property rights: Implications for economic development and growth. European Economic Review, 2008, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 237–258.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eicher T., García-Peñalosa C. Endogenous strength of intellectual property rights: Implications for economic development and growth // European Economic Review. 2008. Vol. 52. № 2. P. 237–258.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Temerdashev Z.A., Ratner S.V., Ivanova N.E. Assessment of innovation and management decisions at the regional level, based on econometric modeling. Innovatsii, 2008, no. 9, pp. 66–69.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Темердашев З.А., Ратнер С.В., Иванова Н.Е. Оценка состояния инновационной деятельности и принятие управленческих решений на региональном уровне на основе эконометрического моделирования // Инновации. 2008. № 9. С. 66–69.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fischer М.М., Scherngell Т., Jansenberger Е. Patents, Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe. New Directions in Regional Economic Development. Advances in Spatial Science. London, Springer Publ., 2009, pp. 331–345.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fischer М.М., Scherngell Т., Jansenberger Е. Patents, Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe // New Directions in Regional Economic Development. Advances in Spatial Science. London: Springer, 2009. P. 331–345.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Westmor B. Innovation and Growth: Considerations for Public Policy. Review of Economics and Institutions, 2013, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 50–51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Westmor B. Innovation and Growth: Considerations for Public Policy // Review of Economics and Institutions. 2013. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 50–51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pece A.M., Simona O.E.O., Salisteanu F. Innovation and economic growth: An empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 461–467.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pece A.M., Simona O.E.O., Salisteanu F. Innovation and economic growth: An empirical analysis for CEE countries // Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. Vol. 26. P. 461–467.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Federal State Statistics Service. URL: gks.ru.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Федеральная служба государственной статистики. URL: gks.ru.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Federal institute of industrial property. URL: 1.fips.ru/wps/wcm/connect/content_ru/ru/regions/stat/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Федеральный институт промышленной собственности. URL: 1.fips.ru/wps/wcm/connect/content_ru/ru/regions/stat/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
