EVOLUTION OF VIEWS ON THE ORIGIN OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC INEQUALITY: ANTIQUITY AND MIDDLE AGES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The problem of social inequality appeared at the time of human society formation. Currently, it remains the priority challenge facing any state. In spite of all exertions of the scientists and practicians to find the ways for its decrease, the discussion strengthens. Some stick to the opinion that the inequality is a positive phenomenon allowing an individual to keep his motivation. The rest note that the inequality has many negative consequences both for the society and for the economy. The disputes on the optimal relation of the economic efficiency and social equity continue. There is no single interpretation in the understanding of boundaries of “true” inequality as well. 

The successful solution of the problem at hand requires its comprehensive study and scientific justification taking into account the knowledge the thinkers of antiquity had. The study of their works, which are still on top of their relevancy, will promote very thoughtful analysis of the inequality origin and will allow coming closer to scientific understanding of the dilemma of efficiency and justice.   

The paper considers the views of antique thinkers and scientists-scholastics of Middle Ages on the inequality origin. The author attempts to understand the inequality in the context of history and sets the task to distinguish the statements of great thinkers that are applicable to the realities of modern life. Special attention is paid to the consideration of negative consequences of the increase in the number of rich or poor citizens in the state. The author compares various types of state structure in the context of social inequality and proves the conclusion that new theoretical statements accumulating the achievements of related sciences will promote more thorough, comprehensive understanding of socio-economic inequality origin.

About the authors

Zulfiya Fanurovna Ibragimova

Bashkir State University, Ufa

Author for correspondence.
Email: Badertdinova@mail.ru

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of macroeconomic development and state management

Russian Federation

References

  1. Kene F., Tyurgo A.R.Zh., Dyupon de Nemur P.S. Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya [Physiocrats. Selected works on economics]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2008. 1200 p.
  2. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2014. Kn. 1–3, 442 p.
  3. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2014. Kn. 4–5, 618 p.
  4. Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [Princples of political economy and taxation]. Petrozavodsk, Petrokom Publ., 1993. 159 p.
  5. Maltus T.R. Opyt o zakone narodonaseleniya [An essay on the population]. Petrozavodsk, Petrokom Publ., 1993. 136 p.
  6. Mill Dzh.S. Osnovy politicheskoy ekonomii [Foundations of political economy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1981. 447 p.
  7. Marks K. Sochineniya [Workshop]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 1955. Vol. 2, 651 p.
  8. Marshall A. Printsipy ekonomicheskoy nauki [The principles of economics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1993. 310 p.
  9. Pigu A. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya blagosostoyaniya [Economics of welfare]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985. Vol. 1, 512 p.
  10. Klark D.B. Raspredelenie bogatstva [The Distribution of wealth]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2006. 420 p.
  11. Pareto V. Transformatsiya demokratii [Trasformazioni della democrazia]. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2011. 208 p.
  12. Keyns D.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The general theory of employment, interest and money]. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2014. 405 p.
  13. Oyken V. Osnovnye printsipy ekonomicheskoy politiki [The basic principles of the economic order]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1995. 494 p.
  14. Erkhard L. Blagosostoyanie dlya vsekh: reprint [Wellbeing for everyone]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2001. 352 p.
  15. Khayek F. Individualizm i ekonomicheskiy poryadok [Individualism and economic order]. Moscow, Nachala-Fond Publ., 2000. 255 p.
  16. Shumpeter Y. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The Theory of Economic Development]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1982. 298 p.
  17. Smelzer N. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. Moscow, Feniks Publ., 1994. 688 p.
  18. Platon. Dialogi [Dialogues]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2001. 592 p.
  19. Aristotel’. Politika [Policy]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2005. 393 p.
  20. Ibragimova Z.F. Evolution of views on the inequality origin in the works of foreign scientists. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya, 2015, no. 4, pp. 133–138.
  21. Asmus V.F. Antichnaya filosofiya [Antique philosophy]. Moscow, Vyssh. shkola Publ., 1976. 543 p.
  22. Gurevich A.Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kultury [Categories of medieval culture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1984. 350 p.
  23. Foma Akvinskiy. Summa protiv yazychnikov [Summa contra Gentiles]. Moscow, Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy Publ., 2004. Kn. II, 584 p.
  24. Foma Akvinskiy. Summa teologii. Chast II-I. Voprosy 90–114 [Summa Theologica. Part II-I. Questions 90–114]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 2010. 432 p.
  25. Foma Akvinskiy. Summa teologii. Chast II-I. Voprosy 1–48 [Summa Theologica. Part II-I. Questions 1–48]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 2006. 576 p.
  26. Foma Akvinskiy. Summa teologii. Chast II-I. Voprosy 123–189 [Summa Theologica. Part II-II. Questions 123–189]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 2014. 736 p.
  27. Foma Akvinskiy. Summa teologii. Chast III. Voprosy 27–59 [Summa Theologica. Part III. Questions 27–59]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 2013. 440 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies