THE ANALYSIS OF THE WTO’S ROLE IN THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE OF RUSSIA AND THE RESTRICTIONS IN 2011–2020
- Authors: Demidova S.E.1, Balog M.M.2
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow
- Pskov State University, Pskov
- Issue: No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 5-16
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukieconomika.ru/jour/article/view/100
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5689-2022-1-5-16
- ID: 100
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper deals with the analysis of the essential documents of the World Trade Organization (WTO), fiscal and financial requirements, and restrictions contained in them, which influence international trade. Based on the analysis, the authors made an effort to group the principles of institutional international trade relations, relevant tools, and mechanisms of their implementation, highlighting the exceptions. The paper analyzes Russian foreign economic activity indices for 2011–2020 in the context of the total volume of international trade, relative dynamics of indices, international partners (foreign countries); critically evaluates the statistical data on net export. The authors consider the application of WTO’s tools to support Russian export potential during the first year of the coronavirus pandemic spreading. The paper lists the countries and export goods, in respect of which the intentions to introduce restrictive measures were adjusted, and the states employed the heaviest restrictions on Russian commodities. The authors conclude that due to the trade liberalization, the developed and large-scale economies, ready for the radical tariff restrictions reduction, gain foremost; the restrictions adversely affect countries, which do not have production facilities; negative outcomes emerge for a country imposing restrictions when exporting raw materials. The reduction of import goods tariffs for the less developed countries causes the exclusion of native manufacturers from the country’s local market, the decline in manufacturing. The authors sum up the conclusions about the WTO’s role in international trade. WTO principles aim to develop trade relations between countries, but the participants should have relevant commercial intentions. Based on the analysis of statistical indicators, the authors specify the problems and prospects of Russian trade relations, including those involved in the change of countries-stakeholders. A local domestic market where competitiveness persists mainly due to customer intimacy becomes prevailing for primary sales.
About the authors
Svetlana Evgenievna Demidova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Author for correspondence.
Email: demidovapsk@gmail.com
PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, assistant professor of the Department of Public Finance of Financial Faculty
Russian FederationMikhail Mikhailovich Balog
Pskov State University, Pskov
Email: michaelbalog@mail.ru
PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Economics, Finance and Financial Law of the Institute of Law, economics and Management
Russian FederationReferences
- Zouaoui Y., Terfous N., FitzGerald A., Ellis T., Condon J., Handjiski B., Carreiro J. Navigating the new realities of global trade. McKinsey and Company. 2017. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/navigating-the-new-realities-of-global-trade.
- Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoiy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya: izbrannoe [Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007. 960 p.
- Gowa J., Kim S.Y. An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of GATT on Trade. 1950–94. World Politics, 2005, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 453–478.
- Handley K., Limao N. Policy Uncertainty, Trade and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States. American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 2731–2783.
- Baldwin R., Evenett S.S., Low P. Beyond Tariffs: Multilaterising Non-Tariff RTA Commitments. Multilateralizing Regionalism Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2009, pp. 79–141. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139162111.005.
- Mokgethi T. Effects of WTO Membership on Developing Members’ Trade: A Case for South Africa. 2016. URL: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:937035/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
- Larch M., Monteiro J.A., Piermartini R., Yotov Y.V. On the Effects of GATT/WTO Membership on Trade: They are Positive and Large After All. 2019. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201909_e.pdf.
- Herz B., Wagner M. The ‘’Real’’ Impact of GATT/WTO – a Generalised Approach. World Economy, 2011, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1014–1041.
- Tomz M., Goldstein J.L., Rivers D. Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? Comment. American Economic Review, 2007, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 2005–2018.
- Liu X.P. GATT/WTO promotes Trade Strongly: Sample Selection and Model Specification. Review of International Economics, 2009, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 428–446.
- Hoekman В., Nicita А. Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade. Washington, World Bank Publ., 2008. № 4797. 23 p. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/6341/WPS4797.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- Bureau J.C., Guimbard H., Jean S. Competing liberalizations: tariffs and trade in the twenty-first century. Review of World Economics, 2019, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 707–753. doi: 10.1007/s10290-019-00346-1.
- Siddiqui K. International Trade, WTO and Economic Development. World Review of Political Economy, 2016, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 424–450.
- Gulotty R. WTO Subsidy Disciplines. World Trade Review, 2022, no. 3, pp. 1–12.
- Balcilar M., Bonatod M., Demirere R., Gupta R. Geopolitical risks and stock market dynamics of the BRICS. Economic Systems, 2018, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 295–306.
- Karpukhina O.M. Development of foreign trade activities and ensuring economic security of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2020, no. 3, pp. 13–19.
- Kudrin A.L., ed. Ekonomika i ekonomicheskaya politika v usloviyakh pandemii [Economy and economic policy in a pandemic]. Moscow, Institut Gaydara Publ., 2021. 344 p.
- Gupta R., Gozgor G., Kaya H., Demir E. Effects of geopolitical risks on trade flows: evidence from the gravity model. Eurasian Economic Review, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 515–530.
- Crozet M., Hinz J. Friendly fire: the trade impact of the Russia sanctions and counter-sanctions. Economic Policy, 2020, vol. 35, no. 101, pp. 97–146.
- Nguyen T.Th., Do M.H. Impact of economic sanctions and counter-sanctions on the Russian Federation’s trade. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2021, vol. 71, pp. 267–278.
- Alicke K., Barriball E., Trautwein V. How COVID-19 is reshaping supply chains. McKinsey and Company. 2021. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/how-covid-19-is-reshaping-supply-chains.