THE ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PAYMENT FOR WORK IN GENERAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Over the last years in the system of general education, the situation has arisen when the employees' working environment and their salary fail to meet formal requirements of the legislation. The growth of salaries is either missing or accompanied by the growth of the intensity of work of a teacher. The paper studies the issues of payment for work on the example of two educational institutions of Kazan based on the comparative analysis of the environment the institutions work. The author studied the performance indicators of a general education school and a gymnasium and, on the basis of them, formulated the main problems in the financing and the educational services quality assurance. It is determined that, compared to a state-financed institution, an autonomous institution gets an opportunity to ensure the growth of salary of teachers at the expense of the profits gained in the result of rendering paid services. However, the type of institution influences the amount of financing and, consequently, the salary due to the differences in the financial security standards.

Based on the data on forty schools of Kazan, the author created a two-factor model of the influence of the labor intensity of a teacher and the type of educational institution on the payment for work. On the basis of calculations, it is determined that the type of institution, in spite of the moderate relation with the dependent variable, gives the significant growth in the payment for work at the institution, while the growth of teacher’s load influences it much less. It is determined as well that, in the result of the growth of labor intensity at the gymnasium, the results of the unified state exams worsen. On the base of the analysis, the author formulates the main recommendations for the educational institutions in order to improve the operating efficiency and to bring the level of payment for work into accordance with the conditions of carrying on the educational activities.

About the authors

Gulnara Talgatovna Gafurova

V.G. Timiryasov Kazan Innovative University, Kazan

Author for correspondence.
Email: gtgafurova@mail.ru

PhD (Economics), assistant professor of Chair “Finance and Credit”

Russian Federation

References

  1. Bukalerova L.A., Ostroushko A.V. The monitoring of the regulatory and legal framework regulating the issues of establishing the new systems of payment for work of the educational institutions’ employees. Pravo i obrazovanie, 2008, no. 10, pp. 9–18.
  2. Semenov I.V. Method of calculation of compensation of the employee of scientific and educational institution. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy, 2012, no. 12, pp. 283–287.
  3. Veraksa N.E., Nikitina T.A., Boguslavskaya T.N., Legova T.A. Kriterii otsenki kachestva raboty rabotnikov doshkolnykh obrazovatelnykh uchrezhdeniy (po dolzhnostyam) v ramkakh perekhoda na novuyu sistemu oplaty truda [The quality assessment criteria of work of the employees of preschool educational institutions (by job positions) in the context of change-over to a new system of payment for work]. Moscow, Tsentr psikhologicheskogo soprovozhdeniya obrazovaniya “TOChKA PSI” Publ., 2010. 191 p.
  4. Ermakov D.N. Actual aspects of improvement of the system of payment for work of the employees of state and municipal educational institutions. Aktualnye problemy upravleniya ekonomikoy i finansami transportnykh kompaniy: sbornik trudov Natsionalnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moscow, Art-Biznes-Tsentr Publ., 2016, pp. 38–47.
  5. Skifskaya A.L. Problems of realization of the new system of remuneration of labour are in municipal educational establishments. Zhurnal nauchnykh statey Zdorove i obrazovanie v XXI veke, 2017, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 160–163.
  6. Deryabina E.V., Leonova K.V., Bogdanova T.Yu. Problems of Introducing a System of Labor Standards in Pre-school Educational Institutions in the Framework of the Program for Gradual Improvement of the Wage System in State (Municipal) Institutions for 2012–2018. Vestnik nauchnykh konferentsiy, 2016, no. 11-6, pp. 60–62.
  7. Malysheva I.V., Pukhova E.Yu. Main problems of stimulating labor activity and the system of improvement of payment for work as related to the incentive payments of teaching employees of the educational institutions. Aprobatsiya, 2016, no. 6, pp. 96–98.
  8. Aleshkina S.V., Davydova I.Sh. The influence of salary on labor productivity. Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya, 2015, no. 2, pp. 359–360.
  9. Korzhavina N.P., Chikova O.A. Analysis of socio-economic conditions of effective contract in educational institutions. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 2016, no. 5, pp. 36–40.
  10. Kharchenko A.I. Innovation or traditions of stimulation of labor of teaching employees at the educational institution. Sovremennaya obrazovatelnaya sreda: teoriya i praktika: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Cheboksary, Interaktiv Plyus Publ., 2018, pp. 241–243.
  11. Arain A., Jafri I., Ramzan M., Ali H. Evaluating the Impact of Teachers’ Remuneration on the Performance of Students: Evidence from PISA. International Journal of Science and Research, 2014, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1674–1678.
  12. Sartain L., Steinberg M.P. Teachers Labor Market Responses to Performance Evaluation Reform: Experimental Evidence from Chicago Public Schools. Journal Human Resources, 2016, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 615–655.
  13. Figlio D. Teacher salaries and teacher quality. Economics Letters, 1997, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 267–271.
  14. Vigdor J.L. Teacher salary bonuses in North Carolina: conference paper. Nashville, National Center on Performance Incentives Publ., 2008. 42 p.
  15. Turner R., Camilli G., Kroc R., Hoover J. Policy strategies, teacher salary incentive, and student achievement: An explanatory model. Educational Researcher, 1986, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 5–11.
  16. Hallinger P., Heck R.H., Murphy J. Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2014, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5–28.
  17. Morgan G.B., Hodge K.J., Trepinski T.M., Anderson L.W. The stability of teacher performance and effectiveness: Implications for policies concerning teacher evaluation. Education policy analysis archives, 2014, vol. 22, pp. 1–21.
  18. Mirgaleeva I.V. Development of state-public management in educational institutions. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya, 2012, no. 3, pp. 67–73.
  19. Zhilina N.N. Target capital as the mechanism of private-state partnership in the system of education of the Republic of Tatarstan. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya, 2012, no. 7, pp. 32–36.
  20. Zhilina N.N., Menshaeva L.I. Outsourcing in education as the mechanism of private-state partnership. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya, 2012, no. 10, pp. 24–28.
  21. Balynskaya N.R., Kuznetsova N.V., Sinitsyna O.N. Changes in the remuniration system as a factor incentive management of employees' labor behavior of euvational establishments. Voprosy upravleniya, 2015, no. 3, pp. 96–104.
  22. Mironenko O.V. About the development of the prudential standards for the expenditures for payment for work of the employees of the educational institutions. Nauchnyy vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2013, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 12–18.
  23. The information on the results of activities and the use of property of GES № 39. Ofitsialnyy sayt dlya razmeshcheniya informatsii o gosudarstvennykh (munitsipalnykh) uchrezhdeniyakh. URL: hbus.gov.ru/pub/agency/248177/reports.
  24. The information on the results of activities and the use of property of MBGEI “Gymnasium № 96”. Ofitsialnyy sayt dlya razmeshcheniya informatsii o gosudarstvennykh (munitsipalnykh) uchrezhdeniyakh. URL: bus.gov.ru/pub/agency/136687/reports.
  25. Public report of director of Gymnasium № 96. Elektronnoe obrazovanie v Respublike Tatarstan. URL: edu.tatar.ru/vahit/page2233.htm/page2617609.htm.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies