THE ISSUES OF FORMATION OF GREEN ECONOMIC GROWTH INDICATORS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The concept of the green economy that has been forming for two last decades is intended to ensure simultaneous achievement of social, economic and ecological goals for various countries and regions. In this connection, the determination of standard indices, the selection of indicators and the development indices characterizing them and consisting of attribute and quantitative characteristics is the important issue when creating and implementing the concept of green economic development and growth. However, the issues of assessment and analysis of green development and growth using the system of indicators and simulation are not adequately presented in the native literature. The paper gives theoretical underpinning of the system of green growth indicators, which involves considering environment as the natural capital that provides the substantial contribution to the production and consumption of products as well as other forms of capital. Basing on the analytical study, the authors suggest reporting ecological services as manufacturing costs in traditional national accounts for production. In the result of the study, the authors determined following issues of assessment of the environment contribution to the social and economic development: underestimation of the role of ecological services and nature capital, the inadequacy and uncertainty of prices for them due to the lack of market for many natural resources and ecological services. The content analysis of literature allowed identifying two possible approaches to the development of indicators of green growth and development. One of them is to build the integrated consolidated indicator aggregating the information provided in the form of the index of environmental sustainability and welfare. Another approach is to remove indicators out of GDP to give the aggregate picture of economic growth sustainability and quality since the GDP reflects current income but does not take into account the key factors that determine the process sustainability, for example, the factors providing economic growth.

About the authors

Erzheni Mikhailovna Zomonova

Baikal Institute of Nature Management (Siberian branch of RAS), Ulan-Ude

Author for correspondence.
Email: zomer@mail.ru

PhD (Economics), senior researcher

Russian Federation

Elena Buyantuevna Dondokova

East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Ulan-Ude

Email: dondokovae60@mail.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of Chair of general economics and regional studies

Russian Federation

References

  1. Towards green growth: monitoring progress OECD Indicators. Paris, Organization for economic co-operation and development Publ., 2011. 141 p.
  2. Green economy: metrics and indicators. United Nations environment programme. URL: unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/INDICATORS.pdf.
  3. Ayres R. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme Publ., 2011. 44 p.
  4. Working towards a balanced and inclusive green economy: a united nations system-wide perspective. Geneva, United Nations Publ., 2011. 204 p.
  5. Wackernagel M., Ress W. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact in the Earth. Canada, New society Publ., 1996. 176 p.
  6. Resilient people, resilient planet: a future worth choosing: the report of the united nations secretary-general’s high-level panel on global sustainability. New York, United Nations Publ., 2012. 94 p.
  7. Inclusive wealth report 2012. Measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2012. 336 p.
  8. Bassi A.M. Measuring progress towards an inclusive green economy. Nairobi, United Nations environment programme Publ., 2012. 31 p.
  9. Green economy. Briefing paper: metrics and indicators. United nations environment programme. URL: unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/INDICATORS.pdf.
  10. Annual report 2012. The global green growth institute. URL: gggi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2012-Annual-Report.pdf.
  11. Hallegatte S., Shah A., Brown C. Investment decision making under deep uncertainty – application to climate. Policy research working papers, 2012, no. 9, pp. 1–41.
  12. Bassi A.M. Using indicators for green economy policymaking. Nairobi, UNEP Publ., 2014. 63 p.
  13. GrowGreen. Setting up an indicator-based assessment framework to identify country-specific challenges to promote greener growth. European commission. URL:ec.europa.eu
  14. Working towards sustainable development: opportunities for decent work and social inclusion in a green economy. Geneva, ILO and International institute for labour studies Publ., 2012. 209 p.
  15. Zivin J.S.G., Neidell M.J. The impact of pollution on worker productivity. The national bureau of economic research: working paper, 2011, no. 17004, pp. 1–36.
  16. Steenblik R., Evenett S.J., Hoekman B.M., Cattaneo O. Green growth, protectionism and the crisis. Effective crisis response and openness: implications for the trading system. Washington, World Bank Publ., 2009. Chap. 14, pp. 249–261.
  17. Pittman R.W. Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs. Economics journal, 1983, vol. 93, no. 372, pp. 883–891.
  18. Repetto R., Austin D., Faeth P., Rothman D. Has environmental protection really reduced productivity. Challenge, 1997, vol. 40, pp. 46–57.
  19. Repetto R. Wasting assets: natural resources in the national income accounts. Washington, World resources institute Publ., 1989. 68 p.
  20. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. France, OECD Publ., 2005. 108 p.
  21. Better life index initiative: measuring well-being and progress. OECD. URL: oecd.org/statistics/better-life-initiative.htm.
  22. Brandt N., Schreyer P., Zipperer V. Productivity measurement with natural capital. OECD Economics department of working papers, 2013, no. 1092, pp. 1–37.
  23. Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.P. Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Institut national de la statistique et des etudes economiques. URL: stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.
  24. Integrated environmental and economic accounting: handbook of national accounting. New York, United Nations environment programme Publ., 1993. 198 p.
  25. Integrated environmental and economic accounting: handbook of national accounting. New York, United Nations Publ., 1993. 180 p.
  26. Inclusive wealth report 2012. Measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2012. 336 p.
  27. Human development report 1990. New York, Oxford University Press Publ., 1990. 189 p.
  28. Human Development Report 2013. United Nations development programme. URL: hdr.undp.org/en/2013-report/.
  29. Better life index initiative: measuring well-being and progress. OECD. URL: oecd.org/statistics/better-life-initiative.htm.
  30. China sustainable development strategy report 2011: greening the economic transformation. CAS sustainable development strategy study group. URL: world-governance.org/spip.php?article664.
  31. Nesterov L.I., ed. Osobennosti vosproizvodstva natsionalnogo bogatstva v nachale XXI veka [Special aspects of national wealth reproduction at the beginning of XXI century]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 215 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies