The development of the organizational infrastructure of the innovation ecosystem of interaction of universities, business, and government based on digital platform solutions


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the context of the growing uncertainty of economic and political conditions, the rapid development of technologies, there is an increasing need to develop tools to support and improve the effective interaction of universities, business, and government for prompt introduction of innovative products to the ecosystem of regions. Within this study, the authors substantiate the need to improve the organizational infrastructure of various forms of integration of the subjects of the region’s innovation ecosystem based on universities using digital platforms. An improved infrastructure should ensure the implementation of all stages of the life cycle of innovative projects. The authors proposed using digital innovation platforms as the main structural element of the infrastructure for the integration of competencies and resources. It is proposed to build and develop the architecture and digital services of the platform based on the end-to-end information technologies, such as artificial intelligence, big data, etc. The authors developed a conceptual model to support the procedure for the formation of a trajectory for the implementation of innovative projects using the services and tools of the digital innovation platform. The model is based on the processes of assessment, selection of integration subjects that have the resources and competencies necessary to obtain a product in accordance with the terms of reference, and to implement all tasks of all life cycle phases of innovative projects, including complex projects. The use of the proposed conceptual solutions will allow improving the innovation ecosystem organizational infrastructure, which will create an opportunity to increase the rate of the output of innovative products in the context of set limits.

About the authors

Maksim Olegovich Iskoskov

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Email: maksim250881@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4624-5321

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Director of the Institute of Finance, Economics and Management

Russian Federation

Yana Sergeevna Mitrofanova

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: ya.mitrofanova@tltsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4593-4152

PhD (Economics), assistant professor of the Institute of Finance, Economics and Management

Russian Federation

References

  1. Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Chelak I.P. Classification of the factors of an enterprise innovation ecosystem development. Voprosy upravleniya, 2021, no. 4, pp. 151–165. doi: 10.22394/2304-3369-2021-4-151-165.
  2. Ferraris A., Belyaeva Zh., Bresciani S. The role of universities in the Smart City innovation: Multistakeholder integration and engagement perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 2020, vol. 119, pp. 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.010.
  3. Itskovits G. Triple Helix Model. Innovatsii, 2011, no. 4, pp. 5–10. EDN: PDUAQF.
  4. Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2012, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–35. doi: 10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4.
  5. Razinkina I.V. Evolution of innovation helix: comparative analysis of triple, quadruple and quintuple helix models. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2022, no. 206, pp. 131–137. doi: 10.14451/1.206.131.
  6. Carayannis E., Grigoroudis E. Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 2016, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–42. doi: 10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42.
  7. Chmyr Yu.Yu., Guremina N.V., Belyaev V.A. Problems and features of entrepreneurial capacity formation of the Russian universities and abroad. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2017, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19–28. doi: 10.18334/ce.11.1.37228.
  8. Lukyanova M.N. Institutional factors of innovative braking at the regional level of authority. Vestnik Evraziyskoy nauki, 2018, no. 4, pp. 13–25. EDN: VLJLMB.
  9. Lettner N., Wilhelm S., Güldenberg S., Güttel W. Customers as knowledge partners in a digital business ecosystem: From customer analytics towards knowledge partnerships. Journal of Digital Economy, 2022, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jdec.2022.08.001.
  10. Lee S.M., Trimi S. Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Journal of Business Research, 2021, vol. 123, pp. 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041.
  11. Khovalova T.V. Using digital platforms for strategic development of industrial companies. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment, 2022, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 245–254. doi: 10.17747/2618-947X-2022-3-245-254.
  12. Stecken J., Ebel M., Bartelt M., Poeppelbuss J., Kuhlenkötter B. Digital shadow platform as an innovative business model. Procedia CIRP, 2019, vol. 83, pp. 204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.130.
  13. Kuznetsova M.O. Formation of a strategy and mechanism of interaction between participants of digital platforms. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment, 2022, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 255–266. doi: 10.17747/2618-947X-2022-3-255-266.
  14. Cozzolino A., Corbo L., Aversa P. Digital platform-based ecosystems: The evolution of collaboration and competition between incumbent producers and entrant platforms. Journal of Business Research, 2021, vol. 126, pp. 385–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.058.
  15. Barile S.S., Simone C., Iandolo F., Laudando A. Platform-based innovation ecosystems: Entering new markets through holographic strategies. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, vol. 105, pp. 467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.07.003.
  16. Helfat C.E., Raubitschek R.S. Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Rolicy, 2018, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1391–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019.
  17. Jovanovic M., Sjödin D., Parida V. Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, 2021, vol. 118, article number 102218. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218.
  18. Silva H.D., Azevedo M., Soares A.L. A vision for a platform-based Digital-Twin ecosystem. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2021, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 761–766. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.088.
  19. García Á., Bregon A., Martínez-Prieto M.A. Towards a connected Digital Twin Learning Ecosystem in manufacturing: Enablers and challenges. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2022, vol. 171, article number 108463. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108463.
  20. Rho S., Lee M., Makkonen T. The role of open innovation platforms in facilitating user-driven innovation in innovation ecosystems. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 2020, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 288–304. doi: 10.1504/IJKBD.2020.112801.
  21. Rohn D., Bican P.M., Brem A., Kraus S., Clauss Th. Digital platform-based business models - An exploration of critical success factors. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2021, vol. 60, article number 101625. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101625.
  22. Wagner G., Prester J., Pare G. Exploring the boundaries and processes of digital platforms for knowledge work: A review of information systems research. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2021, vol. 30, no. 4, article number 101694. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101694.
  23. Wei F., Feng N., Yang Sh., Zhao Q. A conceptual framework of two-stage partner selection in platform-based innovation ecosystems for servitization. Journal of Cleaner Productio, 2020, vol. 262, article number 121431. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121431.
  24. Xie X., Han Y., Anderson A., Ribeiro-Navarrete S. Digital platforms and SMEs’ business model innovation: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of capability reconfiguration. International Journal of Information Management, 2022, vol. 65, article number 102513. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102513.
  25. Volkova V.N., Leonova A.E. Model of complex expertise in the selection of projects for inclusion in the plan of scientific and industrial organizations. Problemy upravleniya v sotsialnykh sistemakh, 2015, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 220–224. EDN: VKQSEP.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies