THE METHODOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL RESOURCES OF THE INNOVATION-ORIENTED NATIONAL ECONOMY IN THE CONDITIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The current situation of the innovation-oriented national economy of the Republic of Belarus determines the importance of the development of intellectual resources. The paper offers the basics of the methodology of the development of intellectual resources of the Republic of Belarus. The methodology includes the author’s theory of intellectual resources development, the analysis and their evaluation considering the integral index of the intellectual activity of the innovation-oriented economy. The authors propose the intellectual resource structure and, on its basis, determine the essence of the intellectual. The key role of intellectual resources within the innovation-oriented economy is substantiated – the basis of the development of all resources and the basis of intellectual capital reproduction. The authors determined the reduction in the level of development of intellectual resources of the national economy of the Republic of Belarus in relation to the results of innovative activity, proposed the index of the level of innovation activity development with regard to the intellectual resources – the index of intellectual activity of the innovative economy (Iia). The paper presents the results of the calculation indicating the decrease in the index (Iia). The methodology shows the results of the study of the institutional environment revealing the contradictions in the basic institutions of “management” and “education” that determine the development of intellectual resources, as well as the contradictions in the complementary institution of “marketing” providing the practice-oriented nature of the interaction of the market economy institutions. The authors proposed the scheme of the components of the organizational and economic mechanism of institutional marketing including the marketing functions, within the framework of which, based on the revealed contradictions, outlined the directions of the improvement of intellectual resources development.

It is shown that the institutional marketing is to the maximum extent able to coordinate the capabilities of an organization, the demands of consumers and the requirements of the society in the person of state.

About the authors

Elena Eduardovna Golovchanskaya

Belarusian State University, Minsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: golovchanskaja2011@yandex.by

PhD (Economics), assistant professor of Chair of Innovative Management of Faculty of Economics

Belarus

Nataliya Aleksandrovna Simchenko

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol

Email: natalysimchenko@yandex.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of Chair of Economic Theory

Russian Federation

References

  1. Statisticheskiy ezhegodnik Respubliki Belarus [Annual Statistical Abstract of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk, Belstat Publ., 2017. 506 p.
  2. Nauka i innovatsionnaya deyatelnost v Respublike Belarus: statisticheskiy sbornik [Science and innovative activity in the Republic of Belarus: statistical abstract]. Minsk, Belstat Publ., 2017. 138 p.
  3. RB. Decree of the President of the Republic of Belarus dated the 31st of January 2017 No. 31 “Concerning the Government program of innovative development of the Republic of Belarus for 2016-2020”. Natsionalnyy pravovoy Internet-portal Respubliki Belarus. URL: pravo.by/document/index.php?guid=12551&p0=p31700031&p1=&p5=0.
  4. Kholodnaya M.A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of intelligence: Paradoxes of the research]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 272 p.
  5. Rubinshteyn S.L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. 712 p.
  6. Akimova M.K. The processual approach to intellectual abilities. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie, 2010, no. 17, pp. 84–95.
  7. Sternberg R.D. Triarchical theory of intelligence. Inostrannaya psikhologiya, 1996, no. 6, pp. 54–61.
  8. Gardner G. Struktura razuma: teoriya mnozhestvennogo intellekta [Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences]. Moscow, ID Vilyams Publ., 2007. 512 p.
  9. Ayzenk G.Yu. Struktura lichnosti [The structure of personality]. Moscow, KSP+ Publ., 1999. 463 p.
  10. Golovchanskaya E.E. Intellectual resource in the system of public reproduction: essence, role, structure. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya, 2015, no. 5-2, pp. 400–404.
  11. Akhtyamov M.K., Kuznetsova N.A., Saakova L.V. Substantiation of criterion of efficiency of intellectual resources usage. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2011, no. 5, pp. 17–25.
  12. Chamara I.M. Intellectual resources in the world economic development. Mezhdunarodnyy ekonomicheski forum. URL: be5.biz/ekonomika1/2007/07cimrsr.htm.
  13. Nikiforova S.V., Mamrov A.N. Konkurentnye preimushchestva predpriyatiya na mezhdunarodnom rynke [Competitive advantages of an enterprise in the international market]. Sankt Petersburg, SPbGUEF Publ., 2004. 173 p.
  14. Tatarkin A.I. Intellectual resource of the society: essence, classification, and the role in the social and economic development. Business, management and law. Biznes. Menedzhment. Pravo, 2010, no. 2, pp. 32–40.
  15. Golovchanskaya E.E., Strelchenya E.I. Genesis of the basic approaches and intellectual resources assessment methods. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki, 2015, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 267–286.
  16. Golovchanskaya E.E., Karachun I.A., Strelchenya E.I. Assessing of intellectual activity of innovative economy. Nauka i innovatsii, 2017, vol. 8, no. 174, pp. 48–53.
  17. Luchenok A.I. The issues of improvement of Belarusian institutional system. Nauchnye trudy Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. Minsk, BGEU Publ., 2016. Vyp. 9, pp. 201–207.
  18. Pranevich A.A. Theoretical grounds and world experience of institutional construction of competitive relations. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik universiteta. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov uchenykh i aspirantov, 2013, no. 21-1, pp. 176–182.
  19. Dayneko A.E., ed. Sistema ekonomicheskikh institutov Respubliki Belarus [The system of economic institutes of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2015. 279 p.
  20. Baynev V.F. About the System-wide limitations of the social and economic development of countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. Belarus 2030: gosudarstvo, biznes, nauka, obrazovanie: materialy 4-oy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Minsk, Pravo i ekonomika Publ., 2017, pp. 12–13.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)