THE FORMATION OF CLUSTER-NETWORK MODEL OF INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIP ON THE BASE OF “SMART SPECIALIZATION”


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The cluster-network model of the economy organization concentrates the government authorities on the solution of the important public challenges by the development of top markets and innovations. The search for the regions’ “smart specialization” is the newest tendency in the sphere of cluster policy. Such specialization becomes the mechanism of transition to the postindustrial type of the economy development allowing the innovative partnership parties to diversify their activity at the simultaneous regional specialization enhancement. The paper covers the rationale of the significance of applying the “smart specialization” strategy as the efficient tool for regional innovative development in the domestic economy. To achieve the assigned tasks, the authors analyzed the definitions of such notions as “clusters”, “smart specialization strategy”, considered the preconditions for the advanced countries’ transition to the implementation of the “smart specialization” strategy based on the analysis of disadvantages of the existing innovative strategies of development. It allowed detecting the number of distinctive features of the “smart specialization” strategy. In particular, the authors marked the “process of business inventions” highlighting the necessity of participation of a wide range of business entities in the specialization and regional development priorities determination. It is established that, except the traditional groups of innovative partnership participating in the process of development and implementation of the regional development priorities (business, science, and state), the classification developed within the “smart specialization” concept involves the civil society, investors, and experts. The authors carried out the theoretical study of the feasibility to adapt the “smart specialization” strategy and the prospects of its applying in the national economic system and formulated the advantages of the applying the “smart specialization” strategy in the view of the critical necessity of transition of Russia to the innovative path of development. Based on the results of the study, it is established that the creation of cluster formation system on the basis of “smart specialization” will allow improving the efficiency of the domestic economy clustering by the technological retooling of the existing manufacturing industries, define the vector of interregional and international interaction in order to improve the investment attractiveness of Russian regions.

About the authors

Yuliya Vladimirovna Dubrovskaya

Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm

Author for correspondence.
Email: uliadubrov@mail.ru

PhD (Economics), assistant professor of Chair Economics and Finance

Russian Federation

Mariya Romanovna Kudryavtseva

Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm

Email: mari.shtykhno@gmail.com

postgraduate student of Chair of Economics and Finance

Russian Federation

References

  1. Michael E.P. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 1990, no. 3, pp. 91–92.
  2. Akatov N.B., Gakashev M.M., Tolchin S.V. Approaches to the formation of the modern management model of industrial clusters. Vestnik Permskogo natsionalnogo issledovatelskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki, 2015, no. 4, pp. 19–35.
  3. Map of clusters of Russia. URL: clusters.monocore.ru.
  4. Ketels Ch. European Clusters. Structural change in Europe. Innovative City and Business Regions. Bollschweil, Hagbarth Publ., 2004, pp. 1–5.
  5. Porter M. Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic development quarterly, 2000, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34.
  6. Woodward Douglas P. Industry location, economic development incentives, and clusters. The review of regional studies, 2012, vol. 42, pp. 5–23.
  7. Barkley D., Henry M. Targeting industry clusters for regional development: an overview of the REDRL approach: research report 05-2002-03 by regional economic development research laboratory Сlemson. South Carolina, University Clemson Publ., 2002. 26 p.
  8. Moreno R., Paci R., Usai S. Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe. The annals of regional science, 2012, no. 39, pp. 715–739.
  9. Foray D., David P.A., Hall B. Smart Specialization: the concept. Knowledge for growth. Prospects for science, technology, and innovation: selected papers from research commissioner Janez Potochnk’s. Belgium, Expert Group Publ., 2009, pp. 20–24.
  10. Europe 2020 Strategy. URL: eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF.
  11. Regulation of the European parliament and of the council of 17 December 2013 no 1303/2013. EUR-Lex access to European union law. URL: eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/en/TXT/?qid=1480405198458&uri=CELEX:32013R1303.
  12. Gireyko R. Methodology for determining the priorities and sustainable growth poles of regional development in Belarus is based on best international practices. URL: regdev.by/ru/download/file/fid/329.
  13. Guide on research and innovation strategies for smart specialization. Smart specialisation platform. URL: s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
  14. Smart specialisation platform. URL: s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/s3-platform.
  15. Karayannis E., Grigorudis E. Quadruple helix of innovation and “smart specialization”: the production of knowledge and national competitiveness. Forsayt, 2016, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–42.
  16. Istomina L.A. Klastery i klasternaya politika: genezis, evolyutsiya, instrument [Clusters and cluster policy: genesis, evolution, tools]. Minsk, MinGU Publ., 2015. 192 p.
  17. Fritsch M. Measuring the quality of regional innovation systems: a knowledge production function approach. International regional science review, 2002, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 86–101.
  18. Feldman M., Florida R. The Geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the association of American geographers, 1994, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 210–229.
  19. Jaffe A. The real effects of academic research. American economic review, 1989, no. 79, pp. 957–970.
  20. Federal State Statistics Service. URL: gks.ru/.
  21. OECDiLibrary. OECD.Stat. URL: oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/data/oecd-stat_data-00285-en.
  22. Data base UNESCO. URL: data.uis.unesco.org/.
  23. Data base Eurostat.URL: ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database/.
  24. The Global innovation index 2015: effective innovation policies. URL: globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2015-v5.pdf.
  25. RF. Order of the RF Government dated 17.11.2008 № 1662-p (revised 08.08.2009) “Concerning the Concept on long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation for the period until the year 2020” (together with “The Concept of long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation for the period until the year 2020”). (In Russ.)
  26. Dubrovskaya Yu.V., Kozonogova E.V. An analysis of economy clustering (based on the international experience). Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik, 2016, no. 58, pp. 126–146.
  27. Regions need “smart specialization”. Rossiyskaya klasternaya observatoriya. URL: cluster.hse.ru/news/1286/.
  28. Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. Regions-innovators and innovative periphery of Russia. Study of ICT-products diffusion. Regionalnye issledovaniya, 2014, no. 3, pp. 27–37.
  29. Tödtling F., Trippl M. One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 2005, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1203–1219.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies