Spatiotemporal analysis of the problems of innovative development in the sectoral context under sanctions and import substitution policy


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The importance and inherence of innovations in the context of the current technological paradigm cause the necessity to develop approaches and tools for their effective management within individual enterprises at the level of groups of economic entities and sustainable development of regions of their localization as a whole. The formation of such solutions requires an analysis of the problems of innovative development and innovation policy to identify the basic patterns of their changes, and mutual interaction in the temporal, spatial, and sectoral context. The purpose of the study was to analyze the potential spatiotemporal influence of key factors groups on innovation activity effectiveness and its delay in the context of industry-based specifics of specialization of the Russian Federation regions. The authors considered the variants of manifestation of factors on the initially diverse geographical, socio-economic, political, and other conditions groups (regions) of resources and abilities to assess the influence of specified factors on the systems different by the initial parameters. Moreover, the specific feature is the analysis of factors’ impact on the result of implementation in the systems rather than disparate sets of resources and abilities. The authors analyzed possible specific patterns depending on the structure of this system and its initial conditions, which can serve as the basis for changes in the methodology of innovative development management as one of the key directions of modernization of industrial production and sustainable development of territories. The influence of an attributing factor on the result differed both in direction and in the power of influence between regions, which confirmed the need for the differentiated approach to innovative activity management and evaluation of the results of its manifestation. The analysis shows that the patent activity impact on the volume of innovative goods, works, and services varies greatly depending on the structure of their economic activities. The level of innovative activity is manifested strongly and rapidly in multi-sectoral and mid-specialized regions with an average weight of specialization industries of local and national significance, and in three years, multi-sectoral regions appear to be more sustainable. Almost all multi-sectoral regions show a one-time positive influence of losses for innovative activity, and in three years, it is rather negative for most regions.   

About the authors

Elena Aleksandrovna Kirillova

Branch of National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute” in Smolensk, Smolensk

Author for correspondence.
Email: kirillova.el.al@yandex.ru

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Information Technologies in Economics and Management

Russian Federation

Darya Yurievna Shutova

Branch of National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute” in Smolensk, Smolensk

Email: daria-smolensk@mail.ru

PhD (Economics), assistant professor of Chair of Information Technologies in Economics and Management

Russian Federation

Svyatoslav Anatolyevich Masyutin

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow

Email: masyutin@sez.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, professor of Chair of Business and Management Strategy

Russian Federation

Viktor Aleksandrovich Epifanov

National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, Moscow

Email: YepifanovVA@mpei.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, professor of Chair of Management in Power Engineering and Industry

Russian Federation

References

  1. Smorodinskaya N.V. Complication of the organization of economic systems in the conditions of nonlinear development. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2017, no. 5, pp. 104–115.
  2. Kalayda S.A. Model of creating an economic ecosystem in the framework of economic convergence under the influence of digitalization. Journal of Applied Informatics, 2021, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 28–42. doi: 10.37791/2687-0649-2021-16-6-28-42.
  3. Bondareva N.A. Corporate competitiveness in terms of import substitution. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya, 2018, vol. 12, no. 4-5, pp. 65–74.
  4. Donets L.I., Sergeeva A.V. Strategic partnership management in the regional business space. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2021, no. 4, pp. 15–24. doi: 10.18323/2221-5689-2021-4-15-24.
  5. Kirillova E.A., Lazarev A.I., Kultygin O.P. Neural network model to support decision-making on managing cooperative relations in innovative ecosystems. Journal of Applied Informatics, 2022, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 79–92. doi: 10.37791/2687-0649-2022-17-2-79-92.
  6. Kahupi I., Eiríkur Hull C., Okorie O., Millette S. Building competitive advantage with sustainable products – A case study perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 289, article number 125699. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125699.
  7. Golova I.M. Ecosystem approach to innovation management in Russian regions. Ekonomika regiona, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1346–1360. doi: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-21.
  8. Szopik-Depczyńska K., Cheba K., Bąk I., Kędzierska-Szczepaniak A., Szczepaniak K., Ioppolo G. Innovation level and local development of EU regions. A new assessment approach. Land Use Policy, 2020, vol. 99, article number 104837. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104837.
  9. Barrichello A., Santos E.G., Morano R.S. Determinant and priority factors of innovation for the development of nations. Innovation & Management Review, 2020, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 307–320. doi: 10.1108/INMR-04-2019-0040.
  10. Saveleva I.P., Kilina I.P. Spatial aspects of functioning of regional innovative systems. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2019, no. 7, pp. 11–17.
  11. Dli M.I., Zaenchkovskiy A.E. Specific features of management of innovation activity in regional research industry complexes. Putevoditel predprinimatelya, 2015, no. 27, pp. 179–187.
  12. Makarov V., Ayvazyan S., Afanasev M., Bakhtizin A., Nanavyan A. Modeling the development of regional economy and an innovation space efficiency foresight. Forsayt, 2016, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 76–90. doi: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.3.76.90.
  13. Kirillova E.A., Danilenko N.A. Critical analysis of factors determining sustainable development of territories in a strategic perspective. Vestnik universiteta, 2021, no. 11, pp. 110–123. doi: 10.26425/1816-4277-2021-11-110-123.
  14. Nikitenko S.M., Mesyats M.A., Lovchikov V.P. Intellectual pledge: foreign experience and prospects of sustainable development of region’s economy. Innovatsii, 2018, no. 8, pp. 66–73.
  15. Klypin A.V., Vyunov S.S. Patent analysis and public policy in the field of intellectual property. Upravlenie naukoy i naukometriya, 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 136–171. doi: 10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-2.136-171.
  16. Kirillova E. The role of scientific and industrial cooperation in assessing the innovative potential of an industrial enterprise and the approach to evaluation through joint patent and licensing activities. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 2020, vol. 172, pp. 507–516. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2244-4_49.
  17. Yuan B., Zhang Y. Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: The moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 243, article number 118543. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118543.
  18. Gokhberg L.M., ed. Reyting innovatsionnogo razvitiya subektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The rating of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2021. 274 p.
  19. Sharafutdinova L.R. The essence of a high-tech enterprise and the modern approaches to the definition. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2021, no. 3, pp. 207–213. doi: 10.14451/1.196.207.
  20. Malykh O.E., Gafarova E.A. High-tech industries of the Russian economy: scope and resources of development. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment, 2018, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 70–78. doi: 10.14529/em180409.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies