PRECARIZATION AS A RESULT OF TRANSFORMATION OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SYSTEMS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper reveals analytically the essence and special aspects of such phenomenon as “precarization”, which involves wide spheres and groups of modern society and influences negatively the various (social, economic) components of the life of an individual and the population in general. The state of precarious work in Russia is proved by the statistical data for 2004–2015.

The center place is given in the paper to the consideration of the problems and causes of mass precarization of employment in the world and in Russia. The authors considered the demographic growth and the rejuvenation of population, globalization processes and the formation of the open global market of goods, services and labor, general human migration, the commercialization of public institutions, scientific and technological progress and robotization to be the global trends. Among the main problems associated with the development of precarization in Russia, the authors specify the low salary level, and, as a consequence, the low solvency of population; weak public confidence in social security due to the instability of state policy systems; the significant number of single-industry towns, whose life is depends completely on the operation of one or two enterprises; the disproportionality between supply and demand of certain categories of employees.

These factors contribute to the formation of social injustice, the formation of precariat class in the society structure, the aggravation of contradictions between the rich and the poor, the strengthening of social and political instability. The authors form two groups among the precaria: volunteers and forced precariat. Since they have a completely different attitude to their status, the authors suggest different ways to solve the problems of these groups

In general, these economic and social processes require a fundamental study and transformation of the current situation to improve people’s living standards, the precarization inhibition all over the world, and the global economy recovery. Consequently, the goal of the study is the analysis of precarization causes including the specific conditions of Russian social and economic processes and the identifying the main ways to solve this problem.

About the authors

Tatyana Pavlovna Rakhlis

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: twins08@yandex.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), assistant professor of Chair of Economics and Finance

Russian Federation

Natalya Vladimirovna Skvortsova

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Email: skvortsova.nv@mail.ru

PhD (Economics), assistant professor of Chair of Economics and Finance

Russian Federation

Svetlana Vladimirovna Koptyakova

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Email: svetlana.cop@yandex.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Governmental and Local Administration and HR Management

Russian Federation

References

  1. Standing G. The Precariat: the new dangerous class. New York, Bloomsbury Academic Publ., 2011. 209 p.
  2. Toshchenko Zh.T. Precariat – a new social class. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, no. 6, pp. 3–13.
  3. Federal state statistics service. URL: gks.ru/.
  4. Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Precariat: theory and empirical analysis (polls in Russia, 1994–2013 data). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, no. 12, pp. 99–110.
  5. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy ezhegodnik 2015: statisticheskiy sbornik [Russian statistical yearbook 2015. Statistics digest]. Moscow, Rosstat Publ., 2015. 729 p.
  6. Mansel J., Heitmeyer W. Precarity, segregation, and poverty in the social space – overview of the research status 2010. Deutsches institute fur Urbanistik. difu.de/publikationen/precarity-segregation-and-povertyin-the-social-space.html.
  7. McKay S. Study on precarious work and social rights. London, Working Lives Research Institute Publ., 2012. 306 p.
  8. Lukyanova A.L. Earnings inequality and informal economy in Russia (2000–2010). Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2013, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 212–238.
  9. Rumyantseva E.E. Novaya ekonomicheskaya entsiklopediya [New economic encyclopedia]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2008. 829 p.
  10. Koptyakova S.V., Rakhlis T.P., Skvortsova N.V. The first experience of Russia in the WTO: the banking sector. Life science journal, 2014, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 385–388.
  11. Cedric G.J. The urban precariat, neoliberalization, and the soft power of humanitarian design. Journal of developing societies, 2011, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 445–475.
  12. Varshavskaya E.Ya., Donova I.V. Informal employment in the corporate sector (where and what do those who are invisible from above. Mir Rossii: sotsiologiya, etnologiya, 2013, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 148–173.
  13. Rakhlis T.P., Skvortsova N.V., Koptyakova S.V., Balynskaya N.R. Development of microelectronics in the circumstances of the innovative and technological growth of the Russian economy. International business management, 2016, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 401–407.
  14. Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V., Kolosova R.P., Razumova T.O. Zanyatost i sotsialnaya prekarizatsiya v Rossii: vvedenie v analiz [Employment and social prekarisation in Russia: introduction to the analysis]. Moscow, TEIS Publ., 2014. 94 p.
  15. Mekhanik A. The insulted and injured modern world. Ekspert, 2014, no. 1. URL: expert.ru/expert/2015/01/unizhennyie-i-oskorblennyie-sovremennogomira.
  16. Kretsos L., Livanos I. The extent and determinants of precarious employment in Europe. International journal of manpower, 2016, no. 37, pp. 25–43.
  17. Paugam S. Die Herausforderung der organischen Solidarität durch die Prekarisierung von Arbeit und Beschäftigung. Prekarität, Abstieg, Ausgrenzung. Die soziale Frage am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt am Main, Zeitdiagnosen Publ., 2009, pp. 175–196.
  18. Castel R. Die krise der arbeit. Neue unsicherheiten und die zukunft des individuums. Hamburg, Zeitdiagnosen Publ., 2011. 250 p.
  19. Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. New social groups in modern stratification systems of global society. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsialnaya praktika, 2013, no. 3, pp. 5–15.
  20. Rakhlis T.P. The territory of priority development: new status and new possibility for economic growth of Russian mono-cities. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2015, no. 4, pp. 72–75.
  21. Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V. Social vulnerability of employees and society as a result of precarization of employment. Uroven zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2013, no. 6, pp. 7–11.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies