Digital platforms: the analysis of assets control, transactions nature, and value creation
- Authors: Pozhidaev R.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Voronezh State University, Voronezh
- Issue: No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 36-43
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukieconomika.ru/jour/article/view/248
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5689-2022-2-36-43
- ID: 248
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The sharp scaling of activities and the growth of capitalization of digital platforms, their rapid penetration into new markets determine the relevance of their study as the basis of digital economy. However, despite the growing number of publications on digital platforms, there is no common developed approach to understanding the laws and models of their activities. The paper considers the specifics of digital platforms, places emphasis on the general economic level of the analysis. As the main characteristics for this level of analysis, the author defined the following: the process of creating value, the nature and objects of transactions, the structure and content of assets, the control of resources and property rights. The author considers them as having no internal hierarchy, but being interrelated and complementary. The analysis of characteristics is preceded by the introductory provisions explaining the special aspects of comparison, terminology, classification, and problematics related to the theoretical and applied issues of studying digital platforms. The methodological basis of this paper is the desk study of articles of foreign authors on identifying the specific characteristics of digital platforms at different levels of analysis, as well as the monitoring of publications on the activities of digital platforms, their impact on modern economy and competition with the traditional economy companies. As a result of the study, the author discloses the content of each of the proposed characteristics identifying the effects achieved as a result of special aspects of digital platforms and ecosystems organization. The paper presents the problems for future research and some conclusions based on combining characteristics under consideration. The main conclusion is: the specific of digital platforms is in the creation of value for all participants through multidirectional transaction flows with minimal centralized control of assets but using the assets of the participants.
About the authors
Ruslan Gennadievich Pozhidaev
Voronezh State University, Voronezh
Author for correspondence.
Email: ruslan_pozhidaev@mail.ru
PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Labor Economics and Management Fundamentals
Russian FederationReferences
- Andreassen T.W., Lervik-Olsen L., Snyder H., Van Riel A.C.R., Sweeney J.C., Van Vaerenbergh Y. Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic way. Journal of Service Management, 2018, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 883–906. doi: 10.1108/josm-05-2018-0125.
- Wirtz J., So K.K.F., Mody M.A., Liu S.Q., Chun H.E.H. Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. Journal of Service Management, 2019, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 452–483. doi: 10.1108/josm-11-2018-0369.
- Muzellec L., Ronteau S., Lambkin M. Two-sided internet platforms: a business model lifecycle perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 139–150. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.012.
- Chen Y.-J., Dai T., Gizem Korpeoglu C., Korpeoglu E., Sahin O., Tang C.S., Xiao S. Innovative online platforms: research opportunities. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2020, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 430–445. doi: 10.1287/msom.2018.0757.
- Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2255–2276. doi: 10.1002/smj.2904.
- Kenney M., Rouvinen P., Seppälä T., Zysman J. Platforms and industrial change. Industry and Innovation, 2019, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 871–879. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1602514.
- Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 417–433. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12105.
- Van Alstyne M.W., Parker G.G., Choudary S.P. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 2016, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 54–62.
- Hagiu A., Wright J. Marketplace or Reseller. Management Science, 2015, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 184–203. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2042.
- Alt R., Zimmermann H.-D. Electronic markets on platform competition. Electronic Markets, 2019, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143–149. doi: 10.1007/s12525-019-00353-y.
- Brandenburger A.M., Nalebuff B.J. Co-opetition. New York, Doubleday Publ., 1997. 304 p.
- Boudreau K.J. Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control. Management Science, 2010, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1849–1872. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215.
- Mody M., Wirtz J., Fung So K.K., Chun H.H.E., Liu S.Q. Two-directional convergence of platform and pipeline business models. Journal of Service Management, 2020, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 693–721. doi: 10.1108/josm-11-2019-0351.
- Cusumano M.A., Gawer A., Yoffie D.B. The business of platforms. In Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. New York, HarperCollins Publ., 2019. 320 p.
- Daiberl C., Oks S., Roth A., Möslein K.M., Alter S. Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: Lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry. Electronic Markets, 2019, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 711–728. doi: 10.1007/s12525-018-0325-2.
- Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. The Matchmakers: The new Economics of Multisided Platforms. Boston, Harvard Business Review Press Publ., 2016. 272 p.
- Dolnicar S. Unique features of peer-to-peer accommodation networks. Peer-to-Peer Accommodation Networks: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford, Goodfellow Publ., 2018, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.23912/9781911396512-3599.
- Thies F., Wessel M., Benlian A. Effects of Social Interaction Dynamics on Platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2016, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 843–873. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2016.1243967.
- Barroso-Castro C., Villegas-Periñan M. dei M., Casillas-Bueno J.C. How boards’ internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance. Strategic Organization, 2016, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–31. doi: 10.1177/1476127015604799.
- Kumar V., Lahiria A., Dogana O.B. A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, vol. 69, pp. 147–160. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.021.
- Parker G.G., Van Alstyne M.W., Jiang X. Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 2017, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 255–266. doi: 10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.13.
- Altman E.J., Tushman M.L. Platforms, Open/User Innovation, and Ecosystems: A Strategic Leadership Perspective. Advances in Strategic Management, 2017, vol. 37, pp. 177–207. doi: 10.1108/s0742-332220170000037007.
- Caldieraro F., Zhang J.Z., Cunha M., Shulman J.D. Strategic information transmission in peer-to-peer lending markets. Journal of Marketing, 2018, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 42–63. doi: 10.1509/jm.16.0113.
- Aulkemeier F., Iacob M.-E., van Hillegersberg J. Platform-based collaboration in digital ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 2019, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 597–608. doi: 10.1007/s12525-019-00341-2.
- Benlian A., Hilkert D., Hess T. How Open Is This Platform? The Meaning and Measurement of Platform Openness from the Complementors’ Perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 2015, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 209–228. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.6.
- Malhotra A., Van Alstyne M. The Dark Side of the Sharing Economy ... And How to Lighten It. Communications of the ACM, 2014, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 24–27. doi: 10.1145/2668893.
- Perren R., Kozinets R.V. Lateral exchange markets: how social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing, 2018, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 20–36. doi: 10.1509/jm.14.0250.
- Kornberger M. The Visible Hand and the Crowd: Analyzing Organization Design in Distributed Innovation Systems. Strategic Organization, 2017, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 174–193. doi: 10.1177/1476127016648499.