The system of business continuity management and its mechanism for ensuring the sustainability of an economic entity
- Authors: Safonova M.F.1, Serikov V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 27-37
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukieconomika.ru/jour/article/view/858
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2074-2025-1-60-3
- ID: 858
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The economy transformation under sanction-restrictive conditions requires revising the strategy of functioning of domestic business, in which due attention should be paid to issues of monitoring of business continuity of organizations. The ability of management personnel to ensure the sustainability of an economic entity and its further existence in the near future has a direct impact on the well-being of the state. Transformation of the internal infrastructure is the basis for risk control and maintaining the stability of a company, which is ensured by the internal control system. In this regard, the management of the business continuity system is considered as a catalyst accelerating fundamental changes in business processes, engineering and technologies, their adaptability to new realities and identification of the need for reengineering. The study of international regulations in the field of risk management and business continuity management allowed identifying that the possibility of high-quality, correct and timely maintenance of internal company processes requires proactivity of the internal control system. As a result of historical insight, the concept of business continuity management is revealed both from the standpoint of company recovery and as a prophylactic measure to prevent a crisis and its consequences. The authors propose a structured mechanism for business continuity management in accordance with ISO standards, which describes the activities of economic entities as a set of obligations assumed by the organization and as a result conditioned by a specific type of activity, with the disclosure of elements including operational planning and management; business impact analysis and risk assessment; business continuity strategy and decisions; continuity plans and procedures; training program; assessment of documentation and capabilities for ensuring business continuity; implementation of business continuity management in the company’s traditions.
About the authors
Margarita Fridrikhovna Safonova
I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University
Author for correspondence.
Email: safsf@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5825-4316
Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of Chair of Audit
Russian Federation, 350044, Krasnodar, Kalinin Street, 13Vladislav Vyacheslavovich Serikov
I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University
Email: serikov_vlad97@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5872-3979
assistant of Chair of Audit
Russian Federation, 350044, Krasnodar, Kalinin Street, 13References
- De La Fuente G., Velasco P. Pretending to be sustainable: Is ESG disparity a symptom? Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2024, vol. 20, no. 2, article number 100418. doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100418.
- Zhiltsova Yu.V., Strakhov V.A. Formulating a stand-alone paradigm of the concepts bankruptcy and insolvency of legal entities. International Accounting, 2021, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 826–844. doi: 10.24891/ia.24.7.826.
- Karzaeva N.N., Sokolova O.V. Assessment of the continuity of the business entity. Bukhuchet v selskom khozyaystve, 2017, no. 4, pp. 70–77. EDN: ZIDLGV.
- Babicheva N.E., Lyubushin N.P., Lylov A.I., Chernova M.V., Uryvskaya S.A. Analiz nepreryvnosti deyatelnosti i ustoychivogo razvitiya ekonomicheskikh subektov v usloviyakh tsiklichnosti [Analysis of business continuity and sustainable development of economic entities in cyclical conditions]. Moscow, Rusayns Publ., 2023. 82 p. EDN: EJOKDK.
- Kucherenko S.A., Serikov V.V. The concept of system-adaptive approach (SAA) as a new approach to ensuring business continuity. International Accounting, 2023, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1157–1179. doi: 10.24891/ia.26.10.1157.
- Safonova M.F., Alekseenko A.Yu. Statistical techniques for planning internal audit engagements and analytical procedures selection. Uchet. Analiz. Audit, 2021, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 51–68. doi: 10.26794/2408-9303-2021-8-4-51-68.
- Bobryshev A.N., Agafonova N.P. Risk management in the project management system. The Economy under Guard, 2021, no. 4, pp. 8–17. doi: 10.36511/2588-0071-2021-4-8-17.
- Azarskaya M.A., Pozdeev V.L. Assessment of a going concern using dynamic normal method. Uchet, analiz, audit, 2017, no. 1, pp. 24–32. EDN: YMIAZF.
- Boyko N.E., Kalinina E.A. Forecasting the probability of bankruptcy of the enterprise rapid diagnostic methods. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2022, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 179–190. doi: 10.51965/20767919_2022_2_1_179.
- Zubkova V.I. Bankruptcy prevention and the financial recovery of an enterprise. Nauchnyy vestnik: finansy, banki, investitsii, 2015, no. 2, pp. 27–33. EDN: VNZDHZ.
- Rahman Md Jahidur, Zhu Hongtao. Predicting financial distress using machine learning approaches: Evidence China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2024, vol. 20, no. 1, article number 100403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100403.
- Safonova M.F., Serikov V.V. Critical evaluation of leading audit practice of applying the going concern principle. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2022, no. 1, pp. 41–49. doi: 10.18323/2221-5689-2022-1-41-49.
- Bagreeva E.G., Rudaya A.A. History and modernity of the bankruptcy institution. Evraziyskaya advokatura, 2020, no. 5, pp. 15–19. EDN: SGIXFZ.
- Serikov V.V. Continuity of the company’s activity as a fundamental aspect of its existence. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2022, no. 2, pp. 444–450. EDN: UPPMBI.
- Mityugina M.M., Kravchenko T.V., Chaynikov V.N. Business continuity management system as a criterion for ensuring sustainable development of the organization. Vestnik Akademii znaniy, 2021, no. 5, pp. 208–217. doi: 10.24412/2304-6139-2021-5-208-217.
- Danilochkina N.G. Business continuity as the basis of enterprise activity. Aktualnye problemy sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii, 2019, no. 3, pp. 54–58. EDN: JHVOVS.
- Dorofeev A.V., Markov A.S. Business continuity planning and disaster recovery planning. Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti, 2015, no. 3, pp. 68–73. EDN: UBRFGF.
- Izotov A.V., Kuprin A.A. Development of forecasting and monitoring of management control in order to reduce the risk of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the enterprise. Ekonomika i upravlenie narodnym khozyaystvom (Sankt Peterburg), 2021, no. 14, pp. 23–27. EDN: BDNADI.
- Babicheva N.E., Lyubushkin N.P., Kondratev R.Yu. The going concern concept in the assessment of creditworthiness of economic entities. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1840–1858. doi: 10.24891/ea.16.10.1840.
- Jia Jing, Li Zhongtian. Risk management committees and readability of risk management disclosure. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, article number 100336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2022.100336.
- Danilochkina N.G., Bobrova M.B. Problems of management of continuous activity of the enterprises of the industry of Russia. Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2016, no. 3, pp. 29–32. EDN: WJTSXX.
- Makarenko S.A., Ovsienko A.A. Methodology for detecting signs of intentional bankruptcy as a method of financial control. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2022, no. 40, pp. 410–419. EDN: XNLQBR.
- Melnikova A.N. Approaches to establishing the signs of business interruption risk based on the system of organization’s accounting indicators. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2020, no. 29, pp. 460–466. EDN: YJFSAP.
- Azarskaya M.A., Pozdeev V.L. Information support of economic security risk management of an enterprise. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya, 2019, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 179–192. doi: 10.21684/2411-7897-2019-5-3-179-192.
Supplementary files
